Stephen Clark
In the first part of 1995 I devoted six
and a half months of
my life to an experiment I called "The Laziness
Experiment".
I checked myself into a psychiatric hospital and started to
live my life by a set of fixed rules. The rules were:
I spent the majority of my time engaged in creative leisure
activities like writing and drawing. Also quite a bit of
reading and T.V. watching. This was an easy, relaxing lifestyle
which provided plenty of interesting human contact. However
there were some drawbacks, namely:
For these reasons, the lifestyle would not be an ideal
permanent state of existence.
The fact that I stayed in psychiatric hospital for so long may
prompt the question, "Did I have a mental illness?"
I was not
diagnosed with any sort of psychiatric disorder -- the nurses
often said that there was nothing wrong with me, except
laziness. However, after five months of hospitalization they
were able to put me on sickness benefits (extra money from the
government). This enabled them to put me into a boarding house,
a place where I could continue to live by my fixed rules
without the threat of death, but I would be paying for rent
and for food which was provided by the boarding house. This
was similar to the hospital accommodation, but with the
following differences:
After six weeks of this, the Laziness Experiment reached its
end and the "rules" were abolished.
The conclusion we can draw from this is: A human being does
not need to work in order to survive, because modern society
will find a way to keep them alive if their laziness grows to
life threatening extremes. You may argue that the experiment
was a waste of time because there is no one in the whole world
who would rather die than work, at least not on a permanent
basis. I don't consider it to be a waste of time, though,
because those six and a half months were possibly the most
interesting and memorable period in my life.
It's all so nice in the nut-house... |